Mosque, Corner Store and Global City

(9/13/15)

“Allah blessed the ghetto”
Napoleon, former rapper of the Outlawz
The recent study by UnMosqued revealed that 75% of all mosques in America are dominated by one ethnic group. In most case, this one group is either South Asian, Arab, or African American. The massive Muslim migrations in the 1960’s and 70’s that created multicultural living space in American Muslim communities has not successfully removed primordial barriers among them, in fact it strengthen it. Mosque as the embodiment of universal solidarity of Muslims has failing to live up its ideal. So if it is not Mosque, where is the alternative space for that? Muslim-run corner stores has unexpectedly performed that task. In Chicago, one of the most segregated city in the U.S.,  it has facilitated an intensive interaction for better or worse between Black residents, many of them are Muslims and Arab Muslim families who run that businesses. A corner store is a store located at corner of the street common in all urban/ghetto areas across the U.S. that sells all needs, including toiletries, food, liquor and sometime a variety of narcotics. How can a food and liquor store enables that interracial interaction?
It is expected that the globalization will transcend primordial identity into cosmopolitan one. The idea of transplanetary community of believers or Ummah gained momentum along with the increasing of cross border interaction between Muslims. The idea is not new. Pan Islamism of Jamaluddin Al Afghani or Muslim Brotherhood of Hasan Al Bana has been part of Muslims’ discourse since the end of the nineteen century. But the massive immigration to the West amplified this idea. They vision America as the new ground to flourish a new common identity and unity, free from historical baggage. There were many institutions have been built to facilitate this. Consequently, the old barriers are successfully removed. Pakistanis and Indian Muslims manage to abandon their differences and create unity in Mosque or institution such as ICNA (Islamic Circle of North America). So as the Arabs and Muslims from different countries. Nonetheless, a new ethno-language based has come to the surface. For instance, the division among groups in American Muslim community is prevalent, especially between the African American Muslim and the Muslim immigrants. Due to its unorthodoxy, the African American Muslims of the Nation of Islam, were considered heretics by majority of Muslim immigrants. Despite there has been a massive ‘conversion’ of members of the Nation to the traditional practice of Islam in 1976 under the leadership of Imam Warith Deen Mohammed, the tension between those groups prevails. The gap is caused by many reason from differences in religious practices, legal doctrines, political values, and economic welfare. Many of successful Muslim immigrants settle in sub-urban and be part of middle class society of the West. Meanwhile, Black Muslims occupied space in the inner cities sharing with poor Arabs and Latinos Muslims. Mosques give sense of belonging for those different groups but at the same time create division among them.
 Nevertheless, globalization also creates a new space for interracial interaction. During my last week visit to Englewood, a poor neighborhood of South Chicago, Rami Nashashibi, the Executive Director of  Inner-City Muslim Action Network (IMAN) explained that corner store acts as intersection for various identities to meet and interact. For Blacks, the only contact most had with person outside their race was with store owners. While for the Arab merchants, they may end up in these disinvested communities because they couldn't find a space in other ethnic neighborhoods. But the Muslim-owned food and liquor stores are often a site of conflict between the business owners and Black residents. The stores are perceived as a source of major problems in this poor neighborhoods as Nashashibi continued his explanation. There has been a growing mistrust between these groups. According to his survey, 70 percent of surveyed store owners felt their businesses “have positive impact on the community”, while only 18 percent of residents felt the same.
 For the last few years, Nashashibi and his team has tried to construct racial solidarity through these corner store. The arranged discussion forum for both store owners and residents to find solution. The residents help the store owner to clean their store, bring them more customers and as the compensation they have to make pledge for selling healthy products, stop selling liquor and conduct a better business practice. They revitalized corners stores in the neighborhood and set up network of Muslim Run store. IMAN brings back the business model as practiced by the Nation before.  Now we can see the fruits of their effort. In 2012, more than 15 corner stores participated in this program. There is interracial healing process going on there. Moreover, some corner stores has become an entry point for broader transformation of the neighborhood addressing food desserts, promoting food justice, and developing alternative business model.
What can we reflect from this phenomena related to globalization? Globalization indeed reconfigures the social space of human interaction, which is in this case through migration. Yet, it did not created a uniform consequences with respect to identity as mentioned by Jan Aart Scholte. Using Mosque and corner store as comparison, migration bolsters primordialism at the mosque but initiating cosmopolitanism at corner store. Moreover, in term of positive and negative outcomes, globalization has not automatically determined the end result, but communities’ responses or choices contribute to it. The corner store may persist as a locus for racial intersection that is merely instilling prejudice and tension, and source of criminal activities. Yet, local initiative has enable it to become the source of community improvement. So as the mosque should be.
If we zoom out from our discussion of mosque and corner store into a broader discourse on U.S. cities, globalization has indeed transformed those into global and multicultural cities. The political turmoil back home and economic opportunities at those cities encourage people to do migration.  According to Saskia Sassen as a result of privatization, deregulation, the opening up of national economies to foreign firms, and growing involvement of private actors, the key articulators of cross-borders economic activities are no longer monopolized by state. There has been re-scaling of economic strategic environment. It shifted to the sub-national level. The sub-national, which is cities and regions, have become important players and locus for the current economic activities. Nevertheless, it did not create a single layer reality of global city. In line with previous argument, a multilayered space has been formed especially within the periphery of today’s global city. Homogeneity exists in form of mass consumerism, yet racial and social segregation is strengthen inside. Moreover, she argues that cities have become a part of larger “geography of centrality and marginality”. It was not only creating political and economic center of urban life but also different type political, economic and cultural expression found in ghettos. In this case, we can consider #Blacklivesmatter movement as reaction to this marginalization process. If was not merely fueled by incidents of police shootings, but it is intensified by centuries-old project of institutionalized racism that continues today. Mosque, corner store, and global city are more complex than merely religious, economic, and socio political spheres. Those spaces are intersection local and global aspects of globalization.



Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Modern vs Traditional Time

Mengapa Amerika? bagian 3-being a Monarch